Ottó began his schooling in Poprád where he attended the local Hungarian primary school. Despite it being an Hungarian school, his teacher was German. In 1919 he began his secondary schooling at the Lutheran High School in Késmárk, which is an attractive historic town at the foot of the Tatra mountains about 15 km north east of Poprád. Teaching at this school was in German and quickly Ottó spoke both Czech and German as a native speaker. Now Ottó began his secondary education after World War I had ended and at that time Szepes County had become part of Slovakia within Czechoslovakia. This was confirmed in the international Treaty of Trianon in 1920 which set the borders of Hungary. We should note that the town of Késmárk is now known as Kezmarok in Slovakia.
The director of the Lutheran High School in Késmárk was Károly Bruckner (born 1875). Now Bruckner was a Cipszerek, a German-speaking ethnic group in Szepes. He had taken part in the Szepes Republic which was formed in 1918 before the region was taken over by the Czechs and Slovaks. In addition to being the director of the school, Bruckner taught mathematics and it was his teaching that inspired Varga. Tünde Kántor writes that at the gymnasium Varga was a good student in all subjects but :-
... loved descriptive geometry as well. For a long time he did not understand why the teacher explained so much, why he kept repeating and illustrating details, whereas he found everything clear from the first moment, and he saw lines and planes in space exactly. Later he also made a good use of his extraordinary stereoscopic vision in his world-famous studies in differential geometry.His abilities meant that, while at the Gymnasium, Varga's teacher asked him to help by teaching the less able students. However, when he was sixteen years old he began to read the third edition of Adam Ritter von Burg's Compendium der höhern Mathematik Ⓣ. Adam von Burg (1797-1882) had originally published the book in Vienna in 1836 and this third edition appeared in 1859. When Varga began to study this book he realised that, although he had been doing well in mathematics at school, he actually knew very little mathematics. He graduated from the Lutheran High School in Kezmarok in 1927 and began his studies at university.
Now although Varga was primarily interested in mathematics, his father was keen that he should train for a useful profession and certainly Imre didn't see mathematics as falling into this category. Varga, therefore, entered the Faculty of Architecture at the Technical University of Vienna in 1927. Choosing architecture was basically a compromise between Varga's wish to study mathematics and his father's wish that he train for a useful profession. Certainly there was some descriptive geometry taught in the architecture course, which Varga loved, but there was not nearly enough mathematics to keep him happy. After one year in Vienna, he moved to Prague where he enrolled as a student in the Faculty of Sciences at the German University of Prague and also registered for courses at the Czech Technical University of Prague. This technical university had been the Prague Polytechnical Institute before the Austro-Hungarian Empire was dissolved and had only become the Czech Technical University of Prague in 1920. We also note that the Charles University of Prague had been the Charles-Ferdinand University of Prague in the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This university had been split into the Czech Charles-Ferdinand University and the German Charles-Ferdinand University since the middle of the 19th century but after the end of the Austro-Hungarian Empire the German Charles-Ferdinand University became the German University of Prague while the Czech Charles-Ferdinand University became the Charles University of Prague.
Ludwig Berwald became a full professor at the German University of Prague in 1924 and, after Georg Pick retired in 1929, he became head of the Department of Mathematics. Berwald was an expert in differential geometry and considered by many as the founder of Finsler geometry. He soon realised that Varga had a special talent for geometry and began to advise him on topics in differential geometry; Varga began to undertake research. In 1933 he graduated with a degree which qualified him to teach mathematics and descriptive geometry at high school level. He continued research, advised by Berwald, and was awarded a Ph.D. in 1934 for his thesis On Finsler spaces. Berwald then advised Varga to continue his studies in Hamburg where Wilhelm Blaschke headed a world-famous school of geometry. Varga spent the academic year 1934-35 at Hamburg. While in Hamburg in March 1935 he submitted the paper Integralgeometrie 3. Croftons Formeln für den Raum Ⓣ to Mathematische Zeitschrift. This paper was the third in a series of papers on integral geometry, the first two being written by Blaschke and both being published in 1935. Varga published a joint paper with Blaschke, namely Integralgeometrie 9. Über Mittelwerte an Eikörpern Ⓣ which appeared in 1936. In July 1936 he submitted the paper Integralgeometrie 19. Mittelwerte an dem Durchschnitt bewegter Flächen Ⓣ to Mathematische Zeitschrift. He gives both Hamburg and Prague as his address on this paper since he was appointed to the Institute of Mathematics at the University of Prague in 1936. He writes in this paper:-
I wish to express my thanks to Herr Blaschke for his suggestion concerning this work, as well as his valuable advice.In February 1937, now working as Berwald's assistant in Prague, Varga and Berwald submitted the joint paper Integralgeometrie 24. Über die Schiebungen im Raum Ⓣ to Mathematische Zeitschrift. They give the following acknowledgement to Blaschke:-
We would like to take this opportunity to express our thanks to Herr Blaschke, who sent us copies of his available work, for his kindness.In 1938 Varga spoke at the meeting of the meeting of the Deutscher Physiker und Mathematikertag in Baden-Baden. In  an interesting episode is related (we have no independent collaboration of this story). It begins with a letter sent by Gerhard Kowalewski (1876-1950) to Ludwig Bieberbach. In 1940 Kowalewski was a member of the Nazi Party, an editor of Deutsche Mathematik and a professor of mathematics at the German University of Prague. He wrote to Bieberbach from Prague in December 1940 to complain about Blaschke's treatment of Varga :-
According to Kowalewski, Varga gave a quite original talk in integral geometry at Baden-Baden and, naturally enough, apparently sent Blaschke a manuscript of his talk. Blaschke asked him for a manuscript publishable in the Hamburger 'Abhandlungen'. Varga replied that he had already sent it elsewhere. Many weeks later Varga received his manuscript back "with the dry remark" that in Hamburg similar results were already known. Then Blaschke published the same result, even using Varga's notation. Varga's paper appeared in an obscure journal published in Pressburg (modern Bratislava) with a footnote referring to his Baden-Baden lecture. Not only did Blaschke not cite Varga, but the two publications are said to be virtually identical. Varga naturally complained - but this only earned him Blaschke's dislike (and, after all he was only a Prague Privatdocent, whereas Blaschke was an internationally known Hamburg professor). In fact, when Kowalewski enthusiastically recommended Varga for a position in Braunschweig, and Kowalewski heard of it, he apparently remarked to the Braunschweig authorities that "he did not know whether Varga stood 100% in agreement with the new state" - enough to prevent Varga from getting the position. Blaschke tried (unsuccessfully) to prevent Varga from advancing academically within Germany itself, as he pressured Varga to accept a job in Pressburg, a suggestion Kowalewski called "rather shabby." It was after this last, in early December 1940, that Kowalewski wrote to Bieberbach - writing earlier seems to have been delayed by illness.By the time Kowalewski wrote this letter, German troops were in Prague. In fact they occupied Prague from 15 March 1939 and, on the following day Hitler went to Prague Castle and declared Bohemia and Moravia to be a German protectorate. Now this German invasion had given Varga a severe problem. He was Berwald's assistant in Prague, but Berwald was Jewish. In October 1941 Berwald was deported by the Nazis to the Ghetto in Lódz, Poland, where he died a few months later. With his position in Prague falling apart, Varga decided to return to Hungary in 1941. He was offered a position at the university in Kolozsvár (today Cluj, Romania) and also a position at the university in Debrecen. He accepted the invitation from Kolozsvár where he again habilitated and became a lecturer. However, after a year he moved to Debrecen :-
At that time he was the single mathematician at Debrecen University. This was not an exceptional phenomenon. Between the two world wars a chair usually meant a single professor and not more. Only the chairs with laboratories, as the chairs for physics or chemistry were exceptions, where one could find a first (senior) assistant.Varga was promoted to extraordinary professor at Debrecen in 1947 and an ordinary professor in the following year. Varga had met Jolán Pukánszky in Debrecen in 1945. Jolán, who worked with Béla Gyires at the Mathematical Institute, was the sister of Lajos Pukánszky (1928-1996). Lajos Pukánszky later studied mathematics at the University of Szeged, went to the United States in 1956 and spent the greatest part of his career at the University of Pennsylvania. He is known for his outstanding work on the representation theory of soluble Lie groups. Varga married Jolán Pukánszky in 1947 and they had one child, a daughter Borbála. At Debrecen Varga was dean of Faculty of Science (1949-1950) and then Head of the Department of Mathematics (1950-1959).
Lajos Tamássy give an excellent account of Varga's mathematical contributions in . Below we give his introduction to these contributions given under the headings 'Invariant differential', 'Flag curvature', 'Invariant basis', 'Angular metric', and 'Spaces of constant curvature':-
If somebody wants to develop Finsler geometry on the analogy with Riemannian geometry, the existence of a linear metrical connection is indispensable. A connection of this kind was created by Elie Cartan. First it was published in his short 'Comptes Rendus' article (1933), and then in his booklet 'Les espaces de Finsler' Ⓣ (1934). Varga finished his first work at the time of the publication of the 'Comptes Rendus' article. Varga introduced and studied in his work the concept of an affine connection and its curvatures in the line element manifold of a Finsler space. His work had a considerable overlapping with Cartan's article and booklet. Therefore it was published only in a local journal in 1936. A few years later Varga resumed the theme, and gave an elegant, geometrical construction for the metrical parallel translation, and thus for the metrical linear connection in Finsler spaces. These ideas were applicable also for the introduction of the Cartan connection and of the flag curvature.Tünde Kántor writes about Varga's approach to research in :-
He was not a scientist of quick, sparkling wits. He kept saying that he would hardly do very well in a competition for students. But what he conceived and thought over carefully in his silent loneliness always contributed substantially to the development of differential geometry and it was always free from flaws and errors. ... In Hungary Ottó Varga was the leading scientist in differential geometry and he became the founder of the Debrecen School of Differential Geometry.However Varga did not spend the rest of his career in Debrecen. Although he liked the country atmosphere there, he always longed for the big city life of Budapest. He applied for a position at Lórand Eötvös University in Budapest in 1946 but was not successful. He became a corresponding member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in 1950 and advised a number of students taking Ph.D. degrees. For example he supervised Gyula Soós' thesis Transformation groups of line element manifolds (1955), Miklós Farkas's thesis Periodic Perturbations of Autonomous Systems (1957), Arthur Moór's thesis Geometrische Untersuchungen in allgemeinen metrischen Linienelementräumen Ⓣ, and János Szenthe's thesis On the metric characterization of symmetric spaces (1967). Kántor writes :-
He did not like examining students, and he asked them only questions which helped them. He was always very patient. He loved instructing talented young people.Varga was made head of the differential geometry research group in the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in 1958, an ordinary member of the Academy in 1965 and, in 1967, he was made a senior researcher at the Academy's Mathematical Institute.
In 1954 the University of Szeged tried to persuade him to take a position there but he refused. Then in 1959 he was invited to become a professor in the Department of Mathematics of the Faculty of Architecture of the Technical University of Budapest. He retired in 1967 from his chair at the Technical University and, two years later, from his position as senior researcher at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences' Mathematical Institute.
Among the honours Varga received, we mention the Gyula König Medal in 1944 from the Mathematical and Physical Society (since 1947 the János Bolyai Mathematical Society), and the Kossuth Prize from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (1952).
Finally, Tünde Kántor writes about Varga's personality and hobbies in :-
He always complained about his health. ... He was very sociable, and he always dressed elegantly. ... He was an enthusiastic linguist, and he wanted to discuss the problems of Slavonic languages from a mathematical point of view. His hobby was reading novels whose plots take place in Upper Hungary. In Debrecen he used to play tennis ... and he sometimes went to Tóth (Pálma) Café in Simonyi street with Béla Gyires and András Rapcsák to have a chat. In Budapest he used to walk with Lásló Fejes Tóth to Hármashatárhegy, or he went to Lukács Café in Andrássy street with Gyula Stommer.He had a minor heart attack in 1961 and a more serious one in 1962. A disease of heart muscle meant that from that time on he easily became tired. He died from heart disease at the relatively young age of 59.
Article by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson