Lipót's schooling was in Pécs but at first things did not go well and his father took him out of school for a while and acted as his teacher. However, his attitude to mathematics changed dramatically when he was taught the topic by his high school teacher Sigismund Maksay. The Eötvös Mathematics Competition began in 1894 with problems appearing in Középiskolai Matematikai Lapok, the Mathematical and Physical Journal for Secondary Schools. Encouraged by Maksay, Fejér began submitting his solutions to the problems to Budapest :-
Laszló Racz, a secondary school teacher who led a problem study group in Budapest, often opened his session by saying, "Lipót Weiss has again sent in a beautiful solution."In 1897, the year that he graduated from the high school in Pécs, Fejér won second prize in the Eötvös Mathematics Competition. In that year Fejér entered the Polytechnic University of Budapest where he studied mathematics and physics until 1902, except for the year 1899-1900 which he spent at the University of Berlin. In Budapest he was taught by, among others, Julius König, József Kürschák, Manó Beke and Lóránd Eötvös. Despite the strong influence of these outstanding scientists, it was the year he spent in Berlin which led to the results which proved his most significant and influenced his whole career. In Berlin he attended courses by Georg Frobenius and Lazarus Fuchs but it was his discussions with Hermann Schwarz that led him look at the convergence of Fourier series and prove the highly significant "Fejér's theorem" published in Sur les fonctions bornées et intégrables . In this paper, submitted to the Paris Academy of Sciences on 10 December 1900, he proved:
The Fourier series is summable (C, 1) to the value of the function at each point of continuity.Fejér's theorem is a simple, beautiful theorem, and, in the opinion of Jean-Pierre Kahane , its discovery restored to Fourier series a fundamental role in analysis for at least fifty years. Also, at that time the theory of functions of one real variable had produced a number of strange anomalies (like continuous, nowhere differentiable functions), and Fejér's theorem, by its simplicity, reassured mathematicians who were disturbed by these pathological results. While attending Schwarz's twice-monthly colloquium, in which he was lecturing on his collected works, Fejér met Constantin Carathéodory, Erhard Schmidt and Issai Schur who were doctoral students, and Edmund Landau who was a privatdozent. He formed lasting friendships with these mathematicians who he collaborated with throughout the rest of his life. From Schwarz, in addition to specific ideas for his research, Fejér inherited a geometrical approach to mathematics and a love of extremal problems. We note that it was while he was in Berlin that he changed his name from Weiss to Fejér and, after he did so, Schwarz jokingly refused to talk to him! Fejér's fundamental summation theorem for Fourier series formed the basis of his doctoral thesis which he presented to the University of Budapest in 1902. This doctoral thesis contained important corollaries of "Fejér's theorem" which also appear in the paper Untersuchungen über Fouriersche Reihen (1904):
2. Weierstrass' approximation theorem: A function continuous in a closed interval is a uniform limit of polynomials;
3. Poisson's integral provides a valid solution for Dirichlet's problem for the circle.
From 1905 until 1911 he taught at Kolozsvár during which time he produced many high quality beautifully written papers: six in 1906, three in 1907, five in 1908, four in 1909 and six in 1910. In 1911 Fejér was appointed to the chair of mathematics at the University of Budapest and he held that post until his death. However there were problems regarding his appointment to the chair as is recounted in :-
Although already world famous and warmly endorsed by Poincaré on the occasion of the awarding of the Bolyai Prize, Fejér's appointment to a chair at the University had been opposed by anti-semites on the Faculty. One of them, knowing full well that Fejér's original name had been Weiss, asked during the occasion of Fejér's candidacy: 'Is this Leopold Fejér related to our distinguished colleague on the Faculty of Theology, Father Ignatius Fejér?' Without missing a beat Loránd Eötvös, Professor of Physics, answered "Illegitimate son". After that the appointment sailed through smoothly.Despite these difficulties, Fejér was honoured with election to the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in 1911 and being a vice-president of the International Congress of Mathematicians held in Cambridge, England, in August 1912. During his period in the chair at Budapest, Fejér led a highly successful Hungarian school of analysis. He published important works such as Über die Konvergenz der Potenzreihe an der Konvergenzgrenze in Fallen der konformen Abbildung auf die schlichte Ebene (1914), Über Interpolation (1916), and Interpolation und konforme Abbildung , (1918). However, he was greatly affected by World War I, and the political events which followed, as Paul Turan recounts :-
Naturally, World War I had an impact on him, to which a serious illness added in 1916. The effect of counterrevolutionary times was shown by a three-year gap in the list of his papers. He never did overcome the effect of those times [the white terror under Miklós Horthy in the early 1920s], as could be perceived again and again from his hints.Fejér's main work was in harmonic analysis. He worked on power series and on potential theory. Much of his work is on Fourier series and their singularities but he also contributed to approximation theory. He collaborated to produce important papers, one with Carathéodory on entire functions in 1907 and another major work with Riesz in 1922 on conformal mapping. However, as a Jew he suffered after the Nazis came to power. He had a prostate operation in the early 1940s after which he did little research and, as a Jew, was forced to retire in 1944. However, after this his situation quickly became totally unbearable :-
Late one December night, the residents in his house on Tatra Street were lined up by Arrow Cross "lads," to be marched to the bank of the Danube. They were saved by the phone call of a brave officer. Other Budapest Jews did meet death from a gunshot there by the riverbank. After the liberation, Fejér was found in an emergency hospital on Tatra Street "under hardly describable circumstances."Although Fejér survived this horrific episode, his mental capacities rapidly deteriorated. He was fully aware that he was loosing the place and would make comments such as "Since I became a complete idiot." Paul Erdős said (see ):-
He was happy when he didn't think about it. He continued to recognize my mother and me. In the hospital he was well cared for, till he died of a stroke in 1959.One of Fejér's students, Agnes Berger, described his lecturing style in the following way (see ):-
Fejér gave very short, very beautiful lectures. They lasted less than an hour. You sat there for a long time before he came. When he came in, he would be in a sort of frenzy. He was very ugly-looking when you first examined him, but he had a very lively face with a lot of expression. The lecture was thought out in very great detail, with dramatic denouement. He seemed to relive the birth of the theorem; we were present at the creation. He made his famous contemporaries equally vivid; they rose from the pages of the textbooks. That made mathematics appear as a social as well as an intellectual activity.Finally let us quote George Pólya  about Fejér's personality:-
He had artistic tastes. He deeply loved music and was a good pianist. He liked a well-turned phrase. "As to earning a living," he said, "a professor's salary is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition." Once he was very angry with a colleague who happened to be a topologist [Béla Kerékjártó], and explaining the case at length he wound up by declaring: "... and what he is saying is a topological mapping of the truth." He had a quick eye for human foibles and miseries; in seemingly dull situations he noticed points that were unexpectedly funny or unexpectedly pathetic. He carefully cultivated his talent of raconteur; when he told, with his characteristic little gestures, of the little shortcomings of a certain great mathematician, he was irresistible. The hours spent in continental coffee houses with Fejér discussing mathematics and telling stories are a cherished recollection for many of us. Fejér presented his mathematical remarks with the same verve as his stories, and this may have helped him in winning the lasting interest of so many younger men in his problems.Pólya writes in :-
Was Fejér eccentric? If you could see him in his rather Bohemian attire (which was, I suspect, carefully chosen) you would find him very eccentric. Yet he would not appear so in his natural habitat, in a certain section of Budapest middle-class society, many members of which had the same manners, if not quite the same mannerisms, as Fejér - there he would appear about half eccentric.We have already mentioned some of the honours given to Fejér but, in addition, he received the Kossuth Prize, first grade (1948), the People's Order of Merit (1950), and the Labour Red Flag of Merit (1953). He was elected to the Göttingen Academy of Sciences (1925), the Bavarian Academy of Sciences (1954), and the Polish Academy of Sciences (1957). He was elected an honorary member of the Calcutta Mathematical Society (1930), and awarded an honorary doctorate by Brown University in Providence, USA (1933) and by Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest (1950). He also served as an editor of the Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo and of the Mathematische Zeitschrift.
We end with this fine tribute by George Pólya :-
Why did Hungary produce so many mathematicians of our time? Many people have asked this question which, I think, nobody can fully answer. There were, however, two factors whose influence on Hungarian mathematics is manifest and undeniable, and one of these was Leopold Fejér, his work, his personality. The other factor was the combination of a competitive examination in mathematics with a periodical.
Article by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson